Fitzgerald signs Deer Lakes Park drilling ordinance
Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald approved drilling under Deer Lakes Park on Monday, signing an ordinance County Council members approved last week.
Fitzgerald's signature was not a surprise. The Squirrel Hill Democrat orchestrated the deal between the county and partners Range Resources and Huntley & Huntley, introduced the legislation authorizing drilling to council and voiced strong public support for the proposal.
There is no schedule set for when the oil and gas lease between the county and Range Resources will be signed, county spokeswoman Amie Downs said. Attorneys from both sides are working on minor changes.
Members of County Council voted, 9-5, at the end of a seven-hour meeting on May 6. Opponents to drilling under the park have asked council to reject the deal since August.
The legislation allows energy companies Range Resources and Huntley & Huntley to drill under the 1,180-acre park in West Deer and Frazer from well pads beyond the park's boundary. The companies hope to start drilling by the end of the year.
The county will receive $4.7 million in up-front bonus payments once the lease is signed. Fitzgerald has pledged to put about $2 million toward improvements in Deer Lakes Park.
Range Resources will donate $3 million to a parks improvement fund and pay the county 18 percent royalties from production.
Aaron Aupperlee is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7986 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.