Final Franklin Regional victim discharged from hospital
The final Franklin Regional Senior High School student who was a victim of the April 9 mass stabbing at the school was released from the hospital on Saturday.
Greg Keener, 15, was discharged about 2 p.m. from Forbes Hospital, said Jesse Miller, spokesman of Allegheny Health Network, in a statement.
The family has asked for privacy as the teenager continues to heal, Miller said.
His sister, Rachel Keener, expressed her reaction on Twitter.
“I am the happiest sister in the world, because after 38 days, Greg is finally coming home!” she wrote in a tweet on Saturday.
A sophomore on the junior varsity tennis team described as a math whiz, Keener was among the 20 students and a security guard wounded in the attack.
Police have accused fellow sophomore Alex Hribal, 16, of using two kitchen knives to attack classmates before classes began that day.
Hribal is charged as an adult. His preliminary hearing is scheduled for June 4.
Four male students, including Keener, were the most critically injured of 12 treated at UPMC facilities and eight at Allegheny Health Network hospitals.
Keener was moved out of the intensive care unit in fair condition on Tuesday.
Reese Jackson, president and CEO of Forbes Hospital, said the staff there is grateful for the students' recovery and the community's continued support.
“It has been an honor to provide care and treatment to the injured Franklin Regional students,” he said. “An emotional attachment exists throughout the hospital for these young men and their families, and there is tremendous joy knowing that they all survived.”
Stacey Federoff is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-6660 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.