Share This Page

Johnstown physician indicted for fraud arraigned in Newark

| Wednesday, May 21, 2014, 3:45 p.m.

CAMBRIA COUNTY

JOHNSTOWN

Physician indicted for fraud arraigned in Newark

A Cambria County physician who fled the country for his native Santo Domingo after he was indicted for health care fraud and tax charges is on his way back to western Pennsylvania, according to federal court records.

Dr. William Acosta was arraigned Monday before a magistrate in federal court in Newark, N.J. He was returned to the United States from Panama, where he was arrested last week.

Acosta, a neurologist, originally agreed to plead guilty to health care fraud and tax charges, according to an indictment unsealed Friday in U.S. District Court in Johnstown.

On April 3, 2006, Acosta's attorney notified the U.S. Attorney's Office that his client was willing to plead guilty after he was indicted, but Acosta had left Florida for the Dominican Republic the previous day, court records show.

The Department of Human Services began investigating the Johnstown physician in 2001 after receiving reports that he was prescribing an unusually high number of narcotics to patients without conducting required physical examinations. He also is charged with evading taxes on his income.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.