Penn Brewery wall falls unexpectedly during demolition to reach beehive, no one hurt
An exterior wall workers were demolishing on Thursday at Penn Brewery in Troy Hill collapsed, sending dust into the air and disturbing a giant beehive that had been inside the wall for years.
No one was injured during the demolition, and the hive remained intact.
Workers had removed two layers of brick from the building and were removing the third, which covered the bees, when the collapse occurred.
Construction workers on Vinial Street said they intended to bring the wall down but it fell more quickly than they anticipated.
Penn Brewery co-owner Linda Nyman said they knew about the bees but had not tried to remove the hive because the bees were not a problem.
Penn Brewery announced the demolition on its Facebook page last week and received a comment asking if it planned to use the honey in a brew.
Nyman said the idea is interesting, but the brewery would have to consult with bee experts to make sure the wild honey is safe for consumption.
The demolition of the wall was planned last year to improve the building's structural integrity and make the area safer for events such as Microbrew Fest in June. The building with the demolished wall was built in the mid-1800s, Nyman said.
The hive is to be relocated by a professional beekeeper on Friday. The wall will be rebricked.
Nyman hopes the construction will be finished before Microbrew Fest on June 7. The event is set to be held in a lot next to where the wall collapsed.
Corinne Kennedy is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach her at 412-320-7823 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.