Appeals court upholds convictions of wife, son of former LeNature's CEO
Federal prosecutors presented a jury with more than enough evidence to support its verdict convicting the wife and son of Gregory Podlucky on money laundering charges, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.
A three-judge panel denied appeals by Karla Podlucky, 53, and Jesse Podlucky, 33, who claimed the 12-person jury shouldn't have convicted them based on the evidence the government presented during a four-week trial in 2011.
The jury convicted them of helping Gregory Podlucky, 54, auction $2.9 million worth of diamonds and sapphires to help cover his legal costs. Podlucky bought the gems with part of the $628 million he bilked from investors in the LeNature's Inc. scandal. The jury also convicted Karla Podlucky of attempting to impede the government investigation of the fraud.
Gregory Podlucky, the company's former CEO, pleaded guilty to bank, wire, mail and tax fraud and is serving a 20-year prison sentence. Jesse Podlucky is serving a sentence of nine years; Karla Podlucky is serving a sentence of four years and three months.
Brian Bowling is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 412-325-4301 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Crosby, Malkin dazzle fellow All-Stars
- Starkey: Rinaldo doesn’t belong in NHL
- Power 5 conferences’ paying cost of attendance worries schools large and small
- Lure of tuition aid, gifts draw college students to ‘sugar daddy’ sites
- NFL notebook: Seahawks warned 15-yard penalty for Lynch obscene gesture
- Long-term solution for wastewater disposal eludes shale gas industry
- ‘Line is definitely blurry,’ state police say of dating websites and prostitution
- One killed in Washington Township crash
- IUP men, women remain among Division II basketball elite
- Ambridge native attemps to build college baseball coaching career at tiniest of outposts
- Fleury’s relay team struggles in NHL skills competition