Share This Page

Study puts Pittsburgh's traffic in middle of the pack

| Wednesday, June 4, 2014, 3:59 p.m.

Pittsburgh's traffic ranks 27th-worst in the nation, according to a study released Wednesday that examined traffic in 53 metro areas with a population of more than 800,000.

The TomTom Traffic Index from the Dutch company that sells navigation devices puts Pittsburgh in the middle of the nation's worst commutes. Los Angeles, San Francisco and Honolulu finished in the top three, respectively, for the worst traffic.

Key Pittsburgh highlights from the study include:

• The average driver experienced a 20-minute delay per hour during peak times.

• The best weekly commute times were Friday mornings and Monday evenings.

• The worst weekly commute times were Tuesday mornings and Thursday evenings.

• Jan. 25, 2013, was the most congested day that year.

• A driver with a 30-minute commute experiences 57 hours of delay in a year.

The study compared travel times in non-congested hours with peak travel times. The study found that the common traffic shortcuts drivers take to avoid congestion are actually adding 50 percent more time to their trips.

Kansas City and Indianapolis were the least-congested cities in the study.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.