Share This Page

URA board members tangle over money to keep August Wilson fight going

| Thursday, June 12, 2014, 11:42 p.m.

State Sen. Jim Ferlo, a member of the city's Urban Redevelopment Authority board, opposed a measure on Thursday to pay a Downtown law firm up to $60,000 to represent it in a dispute over the proposed sale of the August Wilson Center for African American Culture.

“I would hope we would hire a competent mediator to resolve this issue. This (legal battle) is a bottomless pit,” said Ferlo, D-Highland Park.

Ferlo said he opposes the goal of leaders such as Mayor Bill Peduto and Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald to preserve the center's mission as a nonprofit cultural center.

“I don't know where the sustainability is,” Ferlo said, noting he opposed the project from the beginning and thinks money would be better spent supporting development of neighborhood cultural centers.

Board member and city Councilman R. Daniel Lavelle countered: “This is to protect our legal rights.”

Allegheny County Judge Lawrence O'Toole preliminarily approved a deal by New York-based 980 Liberty Partners to buy the center for $9.5 million and build a 200-room hotel above it. The group has said it would provide office and gallery space, and use of the building's performing arts venue to help keep the center going. The center has $10 million in debts.

“A hotel with an ancillary cultural center … is not what the public and the foundations invested in,” said URA Chairman Kevin Acklin, who is Peduto's chief of staff and chief development officer, noting the legal battle is an attempt to protect those investments.

“We intend to keep it as a public asset,” Acklin said, adding he hopes the legal matter can be resolved soon.

The motion to pay the law firm Clark Hill Thorp Reed up to $60,000 passed in a 4-1 vote.

Also Thursday, the URA voted to give a Philadelphia developer until June 24 to complete construction drawings and other documents related to its proposed redevelopment of the former Masonic Temple building on the North Side's West North Avenue.

Allegheny City Development Group LLC has development rights to the URA-owned building. It plans to sell the first floor to the nonprofit City of Asylum and use upper floors for eight residential units of one to three bedrooms each. If Allegheny City fails to meet the June 24 deadline, City of Asylum has said it will walk away — a move the URA said would prompt it to pull out of the development deal with the Philadelphia group.

Allegheny City is redeveloping the neighboring Garden Theater building, long an eyesore. It would house a street-level restaurant and apartments on upper floors.

Tom Fontaine is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7847 or tfontaine@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.