Mt. Oliver man found guilty in basketball court shooting
A Mt. Oliver man who claimed he was standing up for kids on a basketball court when he shot a man was found guilty Thursday of attempted homicide and other charges.
Matthew Henkel, 35, told police he shot Jamal Dixon, 24, on Aug. 15, 2013, because Dixon attacked him. Witnesses said Dixon was in the “give up” position when Henkel shot him several times.
Police said the altercation began when Dixon accused a teenager of hitting his car with a ball. Henkel stepped in. The two men argued and Henkel pulled a gun and shot Dixon. He then called 911 to report what happened. Police charged Henkel a week later with attempted homicide, aggravated assault and recklessly endangering another person. He had been free on $25,000 bail since November 2013.
In 2003, Henkel helped prosecutors convict his brother, Jared, and two Duquesne University football players of kidnapping and killing Andrew Jones, 19, and dumping his body in the Ohio River in Steubenville, Ohio. Jared Henkel is serving a life sentence for second-degree murder. Earlier this month, Allegheny County Common Pleas President Judge Jeffrey A. Manning denied his petition for an appeal.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Four issues that the Steelers need to take care of in September
- 71-year-old among 2 charged in several Pittsburgh area burglaries
- Pittsburgh Mayor Peduto says new police chief’s skills fit the job well
- Pitt well-stocked along offensive line
- Lambo no longer in limbo with Pirates
- Pair share love of dance with youths in Fayette, Westmoreland
- Wainwright, Cardinals rough up Locke in 6-4 victory over Pirates
- State police probe trooper’s arrest at Pittsburgh wedding
- Steelers notebook: Tomlin won’t discuss discipline for Bell, Blount
- New Kensington residents vent anger at council meeting
- BVA assistant enjoys ‘special’ part of game