Share This Page

Brentwood looking at options for EMS

| Monday, June 23, 2014, 10:24 p.m.

Brentwood Council will seek proposals to handle the borough's emergency medical services starting in January.

Despite a crowd of more than 100 residents pleading on Monday to keep their 37-year emergency medical service, council voted 4-3 to seek bids for the service. Council members Rich Schubert, Pat Carnevale and Robert Pasquantonio voted against the move.

Proposals will be sought from Brentwood Emergency Medical Service, the borough's long-term provider, as well as Medical Rescue Team South Authority.

Carnevale said the motion just means that officials are looking to see what's out there. β€œIt's just a feeler,” Carnevale said.

Others said they want to review all options.

β€œI think that I was elected to make educated decisions, not emotional decisions,” Councilman Dean Trent said.

If Brentwood EMS is selected to continue serving the borough, the nonprofit will not receive housing or additional funds for items like ambulance repairs, council president Marty Vickless has said.

Its 10-year lease for space in the borough building expires at the end of July. Vickless has said that likely will be extended until the end of the year.

Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.