North Allegheny's 2014-15 budget holds tax rate
There is no tax increase in the North Allegheny School District budget that board members approved Wednesday, despite a $7.3 million deficit in the preliminary budget.
The $139.5 million budget for 2014-15 maintains the tax rate of 17.4039 mills.
School board members Libby Blackburn, Tara Fisher, Chris Jacobs, Kevin Mahler, Ralph Pagone and Scott Russell voted for the budget; Joseph Greenberg, Maureen Grosheider and Thomas Schwartzmier voted against it.
Fisher said she thought there was wiggle room, so a tax increase was not warranted.
“Until we tighten our belts, we need to hold our millage rate and serve the taxpayer,” Fisher said.
To balance the budget, the board cut $3.8 million in facilities projects and $2.7 million in technology spending, which would have paid for the installation of interactive projectors and screens in each classroom.
Those projects will instead be completed in phases, and the board plans to pay for renovations at Bradford Woods and Marshall elementary schools and Marshall Middle School with bonds.
Grosheider believes a tax increase would have put the district in a better financial position.
“Over the next few years it certainly looks like we will be in a negative position in regards to the budget,” she said. “That negative position will only be aggravated by the fact that we're not taking any tax increase this year.”
Kelsey Shea is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.