Whim nightclub forced to close so building can be demolished for parking
The owners of Whim nightclub have the weekend to clear out their property before Station Square managers begin leveling the East Warehouse building for parking space on Tuesday, Forest City Enterprises spokesman Jeff Linton said.
Allegheny County Common Pleas Senior Judge Joseph James ruled on Thursday that property owner Forest City Enterprises followed proper procedure in terminating its lease with Whim, the building's last remaining tenant.
Records show the two parties amicably amended their lease on July 26, 2012, giving the landlord an option to terminate the contract in the event of redevelopment, pending city approval and 120 days written notice.
In his order, Judge James said the city zoning board's approval in February to shift the East Warehouse property from a nightclub to parking space constituted a redevelopment plan. Forest City gave Whim owners adequate notice, he said.
Attorneys for Whim could not be reached for comment.
Linton said Forest City hopes to start demolition next week so 316 new parking spaces will be in place by Sept. 1, as required in a previous agreement with its lender.
The company expects to build new apartments or condominiums on other parts of the property, Linton said, though no developer has been announced. The property has about 1,130 parking spaces already, he said.
“Station Square has nightlife, a hotel and soon, residential property,” Linton said. “This development will round out the whole package.”
Megan Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach her at 412-388-5815 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.