Westmoreland judge sentences priest to probation in thefts from Church of the Seven Dolors
A Catholic priest sentenced on Thursday to 10 years of probation for stealing thousands of dollars from a South Huntingdon church he once served declined to speak in court and to reporters after a brief proceeding.
The Rev. Emil Stephen Payer, 69, of Unity was ordered to pay $98,033 in restitution to the Diocese of Greensburg.
“Financial accountability in a pastor and the trust parishioners place in him to handle properly parish funds are extremely important,” Bishop Lawrence E. Brandt said in a news release issued after the hearing. “When that trust is broken, it affects the parishioners, the other priests in the diocese and the entire diocese.”
Payer remains on administrative leave and is unable to function publicly as a priest, the release said.
Dressed in a brown suit, Payer answered Judge Debra A. Pezze's questions with “yes” and “no” while attorney Thomas Merrick stood by his side. Merrick declined to comment afterward.
Investigators said Payer drained funds from Church of the Seven Dolors bank accounts between October 2008 and August 2011, using the stolen money to pay credit card balances, for travel and to bolster a private tour business he operated.
Payer was originally charged with taking about $124,000 from the church, but the amount was reduced when his attorney provided documentation that about $26,000 had been used for legitimate church expenses, said Westmoreland County Detective Tom Horan.
“The only things we took off were things that were supported by documentation from Mr. Merrick,” Horan said.
The probe leading to Payer's arrest began after parishioners raised concerns about church finances. Those concerns led the diocese to announce in April 2011 that the church was being audited.
During that time, Payer continued to handle pastoral duties, but church business was administered by another priest.
Four months later, Payer was placed on leave and a criminal investigation began.
A few parishioners were present for Thursday's sentencing.
Fred Teacher called the probation term a “great miscarriage of justice.”
“I think it's a farce,” Teacher said. “He's going to pay restitution — where's he going to get the money from?”
“I will give no money to the diocese, I will give no money to my church,” he said. “He should've been put away for life.”
Payer pleaded guilty to six charges of theft by unlawful taking, receiving stolen property and theft by deception. He was ordered to continue mental health treatment and pay $300 monthly toward the restitution.
According to court records, Payer is accused of taking:
• $2,800 from a safe at the church, raised by the choir to purchase robes and sheet music.
• $4,800 in food reimbursements to which he was not entitled.
• $6,678 in checks deposited into his personal account labeled “needy,” “donation” or “homeless.”
Brandt issued a series of revised financial procedures in July 2012 to all churches to avoid similar situations. Financial reviews are performed biennially at every parish.
“Today's agreement by ... Payer to accept responsibility for his actions and to pay restitution to the parish brings some closure for the people of Seven Dolors Parish,” Brandt said in the statement. “It has been more than three years since parishioners brought their concerns about parish finances to the diocese.
“I think this is a fair settlement which allows the parish to recover its funds,” Brandt said.
Renatta Signorini is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-837-5374 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Steelers QB Roethlisberger not targeting Oct. 25 return
- Johnstown man accused of sexual misconduct at state park
- Cat found shot with arrow in Penn Township expected to survive
- Steelers notebook: Tomlin not worried about Jones’ lack of sacks
- EU offers to ease Turkey’s refugee burden
- Charges pending in Butler County Rottweiler attack
- Penguins rally in wake of Dupuis injury
- Allegheny County budget proposal sidesteps tax increase, boosts jail spending
- Wolf still seeking to raise income tax, impose tax on shale-gas drilling
- Hampton’s Balish, GCC’s Zambruno capture WPIAL girls golf titles
- State Supreme Court concludes hearing on UPMC-Highmark Medicare case