Pittsburgh courts National League of Cities conference in 2016
Pittsburgh is looking to host the National League of Cities' Congress of Cities and Exposition conference in 2016.
City Councilman Dan Gilman of Shadyside on Tuesday sponsored a resolution at Mayor Bill Peduto's request that invites the league to Pittsburgh. The NLC bills the event as the “nation's largest educational event for city officials,” and typically attracts 4,000 attendees.
One of Peduto's first acts as mayor was renewing Pittsburgh's membership in the league. Peduto spokesman Tim McNulty called the convention invitation a “first step” in its bid.
“The mayor has traveled around the country and the world telling the story of Pittsburgh,” McNulty said. “He's also trying to bring others to learn Pittsburgh's story first-hand.”
The NLC is a forum for leaders from 19,000 American cities to share ideas, collaborate on strategy and lobby for the betterment of their communities, according to the council resolution.
The league's Congress of Cities and Exposition conference this year is set for Nov. 18-22 in Austin, Texas. The 2015 congress is scheduled for mid-November in Nashville.
Gilman said the conference would be a great way to mark the 200th anniversary of the city's 1816 incorporation.
“(It) marks the city's birthday and makes the perfect year to showcase our great story to the entire country,” he said.
Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 412-765-2312 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.