City Council to pursue 'bad check' policy
Pittsburgh City Councilwoman Darlene Harris said she will introduce legislation Tuesday that, if approved, would require the city treasurer to develop a policy to handle bad checks that includes recovering the cash and assessing fees.
Harris of Spring Hill wrote the bill in response to a recent controller's report indicating that banks returned $380,772 in checks from 2008 through 2013 because they were either unable to find accounts or determined that accounts lacked sufficient funds to cover an expense.
The legislation requires the treasurer's office to track bad checks, recover all money owed to the city and assign processing fees to the writers.
Mayor Bill Peduto's office previously said it intends to purchase check validation equipment to prevent acceptance of bad checks.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Flyers continue mastery of Penguins at Consol
- Pitt offense eyes healthy balance
- NFL notebook: Goodell must testify at Rice appeal
- Metropolitan Division holding own in early part of season
- Penn State defense returns to familiar spot atop Big Ten Conference
- Longtime rivals Kittanning, Ford City set for final act
- Motorist in Downtown mishap, passenger arrested on drug charges
- WPIAL, coaches are still looking to schedule Week 9 rivalry games
- Gorman: A WPIAL playoff drought about to end
- Schools reopen as manhunt for Frein continues
- Man caught jumping White House fence