Share This Page

Judge stays ruling on Pittsburgh police residency during appeal

| Monday, July 14, 2014, 6:31 p.m.

An Allegheny County judge agreed Monday to postpone the effect of a ruling that would permit Pittsburgh police to live in the suburbs until after the city exhausts its options to appeal.

Common Pleas Judge Robert J. Colville granted a stay in his decision to affirm an arbitration panel ruling that said officers may live within outside the city's boundaries as long as they stay within 25 air miles of Downtown, according to Tim McNulty, spokesman for Mayor Bill Peduto.

The city is appealing the ruling to Commonwealth Court.

Arbitrators in March sided with Fraternal Order of Police Fort Pitt Lodge 1, which has argued for years that officers should be permitted to live outside city limits. Attorneys for the city appealed to Colville, contending that the panel exceeded its authority and had no jurisdiction in the case. The city's Home Rule Charter requires all employees to live in Pittsburgh.

Colville upheld the arbitrators' decision. The FOP previously said it is confident the decision will hold up during an appeal.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.