Lyft asks PUC for emergency authorization to offer service in Allegheny County
Ride-share company Lyft is seeking emergency authorization to operate in Allegheny County, documents filed on Wednesday with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission show.
“Lyft has demonstrated that the public has an immediate need for its transportation network service to improve transportation alternatives,” Harrisburg-based attorney Adeolu A. Bakare wrote on behalf of Lyft.
Lyft spokeswoman Paige Thelan did not respond to the Tribune-Review.
Lyft, along with ride-share company Uber, has been under fire since starting service in Western Pennsylvania early this year.
The PUC, which regulates traditional taxi and limousine companies, has cited 32 drivers, fined the companies a combined $225,000 and issued cease-and-desist orders against them. The San Francisco-based companies have continued to operate.
Both companies applied in April for authority to run so-called experimental transportation network service, arguing they should not be treated like traditional taxi and limo companies. Lyft and Uber use smartphone applications to connect drivers and riders.
PUC spokeswoman Jennifer Kocher said those requests are pending.
Uber sought emergency authority to operate on July 2. The commission's enforcement arm this week recommended against granting that permit but hasn't weighed in on Lyft's request. Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto, Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald and other local officials have urged the PUC to grant the emergency permits until state lawmakers can develop regulations for ride-shares.
The PUC's five commissioners will decide on both requests.
Tom Fontaine is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7847 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.