Five people wounded in 'violent day' in Rankin, North Braddock
Five people were wounded on Wednesday in a rash of shootings in two Mon Valley communities that Rankin police Chief Ryan Wooten called “one of the most violent days we've had here in a long time.”
There were two incidents in Rankin sandwiched around one in North Braddock, sending five people to hospitals with what Allegheny County police called “non life-threatening” wounds.
Five people were taken into custody shortly after 7 p.m. after police saw a gunman leaning out the window of a car firing at another vehicle being chased along Fifth Avenue in Rankin, Wooten said.
The rear window of the lead vehicle was shot out before Allegheny County Housing Authority Police on duty in Hawkins Village ran across the street and stopped both vehicles at gunpoint near the intersection with Kenmawr Avenue, Wooten said. There were no injuries.
Dozens of officers from around the Mon Valley responded for crowd control, Wooten said.
The violence began when a man was shot about 11 a.m. along Pattison Avenue in Rankin, county police Lt. Andrew Schurman said.
The shooting may have prompted a retaliatory shooting at 3:14 p.m. when four people standing on and near a porch in the 700 block of Hickory Street were felled by a hail of gunfire in North Braddock, Schurman said.
Witnesses told police that a car pulled up to the porch, and one or more gunmen got out and began firing, Schurman said. Eighteen spent shell casings were found at the scene, he said.
Michael Hasch is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7820 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.