Ex-state prison guard lied to marshals about fugitive brother's whereabouts
A 12-member federal jury on Wednesday convicted a former state prison guard on three counts of lying to federal marshals about his brother's whereabouts.
The marshals interviewed Ralph Currington, 43, of Perry South on Sept. 23 while seeking Frank Currington, who was wanted on a heroin trafficking charge, prosecutors say.
Ralph Currington, who was a prison guard at the time, said he hadn't seen his brother since a visit to North Carolina in 2012, hadn't talked with him since a phone conversation more than a month earlier and had no knowledge of his brother returning to Pittsburgh, prosecutors say.
In fact, Frank Currington stayed at his brother's home as recently at Sept. 14, prosecutors say.
U.S. Circuit Judge D. Michael Fisher has scheduled Ralph Currington's sentencing for Nov. 24. He faces up to five years in prison for each of the three false statements he made to marshals.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.