Woman wounded during Homewood gun battle; boy, 16, shot Downtown
Two people were shot and wounded Friday night in different parts of Pittsburgh.
A young woman was shot in twice in the upper neck about 8:30 p.m. during a running gun battle between two speeding vehicles in Homewood, city police Lt. Daniel M. Herrmann said.
A 16-year-old boy was shot in the shoulder around 10:42 p.m. near the intersection of Strawberry Way and William Penn Place, Downtown, the lieutenant said.
The woman was driving a sport utility vehicle inbound toward East Liberty in the 7300 block of Kelly Street with a male passenger when the gun battle began with occupants of a red vehicle, Herrmann said.
At least a dozen shell casings were found along the street before the SUV crashed into a parked vehicle, the lieutenant said. After the SUV stopped, the woman got out and ran before collapsing against a building at the intersection with Sterrett Street. She was taken to UPMC Presbyterian hospital.
Her passenger, who may have been injured in the crash, fled before police arrived, Hermann said.
The teenage boy was with a friend when he was shot Downtown, Herrmann said. The two made their way around the corner to Seventh Street where they found a building guard and asked for help. The wounded boy was taken to UPMC Mercy hospital.
The investigation is continuing into both shootings, Herrmann said.
Michael Hasch is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7820 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.