Port of Pittsburgh Commission names executive director
A congressman's aide who helped negotiate more money for lock and dam repairs in Western Pennsylvania will lead the Port of Pittsburgh Commission, the agency said on Monday.
Stephen Martinko takes over for James McCarville, who retired in June, and Acting Executive Director Mary Ann Bucci.
“I don't come in with any preconceived priorities; I want to work together to establish what those are with our stakeholders,” said Martinko, 34. “But obviously, funding is a top concern.”
Established by the Legislature in 1992, the commission is responsible for overseeing and promoting the development of the nation's second-busiest inland port. It has a 15-member volunteer board of political appointees and five staff members who advocate for issues related to commercial transportation on the region's rivers, including government funding to repair aging locks and dams.
Martinko worked for the past eight years in the Washington office of Rep. Bill Shuster, R-Hollidaysburg, where he was the House of Representatives' chief negotiator for the Water Resources and Reform Development Act, he said.
That $3.1 billion bill, signed into law by President Obama in June, benefited the Pittsburgh region primarily by changing the funding formula for construction projects so more money from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund would be available for local lock and dam improvements and repairs.
Bucci said Martinko will start his job on Sept. 8 at an annual salary of $160,000.
The port, which has 200 miles of waterways, is the nation's 17th-busiest overall, handling 35 million tons of cargo annually.
Matthew Santoni is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-380-5625 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.