ShareThis Page

Report critical of Pittsburgh police during stop that left man paralyzed

| Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2014, 2:21 p.m.
Guy Wathen | Trib Total Media
Protesters push Leon Ford while shouting 'Don't shoot!' as they march in Highland Park on Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2014. Ford was shot by Pittsburgh police during a traffic stop Nov. 11, 2012, in Highland Park in a case that has inflamed racial tensions.

A Pittsburgh police report recommended discipline and remedial training for two officers who failed to follow protocol during a 2012 traffic stop and shooting in Highland Park that left a man paralyzed.

The Critical Incident Review Board's report concluded that the situation could have been avoided had Leon D. Ford followed instructions when the officers pulled him over about 9:30 p.m. on Nov. 11, 2012.

The report was filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court by Ford's attorney, Monte Rabner, in his federal civil rights case against the city, former Pittsburgh police Chief Nate Harper, acting Chief Regina McDonald and Officers Michael Kosko, David Derbish and Andrew Miller. Rabner said the report highlights that the officers violated Ford's constitutional rights “as they did not act reasonably in light of the circumstances.”

Ford was partially paralyzed when Derbish shot him four times.

The report, finalized in September, has not been entered as evidence in the criminal case against Ford, 21, of Shaler, who is charged with aggravated assault, recklessly endangering another person and several traffic offenses.

He is scheduled to stand trial on Sept. 2 before Judge Donald E. Machen.

The board — which at the time consisted of Assistant Chief George Trosky, Cmdr. RaShall Brackney and then-acting Cmdr. Kevin Kraus — recommended Kosko and Miller be disciplined for failing to activate their mobile video/audio recording devices. Derbish, the report said, should be disciplined for reaching into Ford's car and using deadly force against the driver of a moving vehicle.

They recommended educating police Lt. Reyne Kacsuta about “the timely submission of all relevant paperwork.”

Trosky, Brackney and Kraus declined comment. None of the officers involved in the stop or Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 1 President Howard McQuillan immediately returned calls.

On the day of the shooting, police said, they spotted a silver Infiniti speeding on Larimer Avenue. The driver failed to stop completely at a stop sign at Meadow and St. Marie streets. They stopped the car at Stanton Avenue and Farragut Street.

While officers were confirming Ford's identity, Derbish said, he noticed a “large, unnatural bulge” on Ford's leg and thought he was armed with a gun.

The report says, “To date, nothing resembling the alleged bulge was recovered from Mr. Ford, the vehicle or the crime scene.”

Police say Ford ignored an order to get out of the car, so they tried to remove him. During the struggle, Derbish said Ford struck him several times and tried to push him out of the car before he opened fire.

Three people were arrested Tuesday night when between 75 and 100 protesters — many of them wearing T-shirts proclaiming “Justice 4 Leon” — blocked a portion of North Highland Avenue near the intersection with Stanton Avenue in Highland Park, city police said. The three failed to get onto the sidewalk when ordered by police.

“It's gratifying to see so many people out here being organized and peaceful,” said Ford, adding that he organized the protest through social media. “It's for all victims of police brutality. It's not about age. It's not about race or gender.”

Staff writer Michael Hasch contributed to this report. Adam Brandolph is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-391-0927 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.