ShareThis Page

Internet privacy focus of event at Carnegie Mellon, to include FTC commissioner Brill

| Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2015, 1:08 p.m.
The Trib reached out to people on Twitter to ask how they felt about companies gathering data.
The Trib reached out to people on Twitter to ask how they felt about companies gathering data.
The Trib reached out to people on Twitter to ask how they felt about companies gathering data.
The Trib reached out to people on Twitter to ask how they felt about companies gathering data.

Popular devices that gather and transmit information about exercise, eating and sleep patterns increasingly threaten privacy and security, the Federal Trade Commission said Tuesday in a report.

The Internet of Things report arrives in time for International Data Privacy Day , which Carnegie Mellon University will observe Wednesday with a host of privacy-related events. Julie Brill, the FTC's commissioner, will be the keynote speaker, Carnegie Mellon officials said.

“Privacy means a lot of things to different people. Fitbits, Nest thermostats — you don't think of them as a computer, but actually they have little computers in them and are connected to the Internet and are collecting data,” said Lorrie Cranor, a professor of computer science at Carnegie Mellon who organized the event.

People have a vague idea that companies gather and sometimes sell their personal data, and that they use it to create ads and coupons specific to the user, Cranor said. But not everyone realizes when it's happening or why.

The FTC's report calls for self-regulation by companies that gather data. The report recommends equipping more devices with security measures, updating security with patches as needed, and limiting the amount of information they gather.

The report suggests giving consumers more choice in the amount of information they release while using devices, while acknowledging that this might be hard to do.

Megha Satyanarayana is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7991 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.