ShareThis Page

Ex-director of Metropolitan Savings Bank in Pittsburgh sentenced to 12 years in prison

| Friday, June 5, 2015, 1:26 p.m.

Lawrenceville resident Allan Becer started saving for emergencies when he served in the Army during the Vietnam War. Now 64, he saved much of the money in an account at Metropolitan Savings Bank.

When two unsuccessful knee surgeries left him disabled and jobless, $57,000 of the money he had saved was gone because Michael P. Bernick, 51, of Stanton Heights and others had looted the century-old community bank, Becer said Friday during Bernick's sentencing hearing in federal court, Downtown.

“It was a bank you could trust,” Becer said. “It had been through the Depression and a lot of hard times.”

A federal jury in September convicted Bernick on nine of 10 counts of theft, embezzlement or misappropriation by a bank officer. The government contends the $347,000 he took from the bank led to its demise.

U.S. District Judge Arthur Schwab agreed and sentenced Bernick to 12 years in prison and five years of probation. He ordered Bernick to jointly pay $9.9 million in restitution to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Becer and 23 other depositors whose losses weren't fully covered by the FDIC.

The other person responsible for repaying the money is the bank's former vice president and managing officer. Donna Shebetich, 50, of Stanton Heights pleaded guilty in June 2011 to filing false entries in bank records that hid its increasingly shaky financial condition from the FDIC.

Shebetich, Bernick's former girlfriend, is serving a six-year prison sentence.

Bernick initially declined to address the court, but after Becer described how he and the other depositors were working-class people whose life savings were in the bank, Bernick said he renovated the bank's façade and made other improvements.

“I did everything I possibly could to make that bank respectable,” he said.

Bernick, a contractor, bought distressed properties, fixed them up and sold or rented them. When other banks started foreclosing on some of his properties, he borrowed the money from Metropolitan Savings Bank to save the properties, Assistant U.S. Attorney Carolyn Bloch said during the trial.

He obtained the money from Shebetich with no credit reports, collateral, promissory notes or payment plans, she said.

While the jury convicted him for stealing $347,000, the amount he pocketed was more than $500,000 and represented more than half of the bank's disposable assets, Bloch said Friday.

He also knew that 34 other people were getting similar undocumented loans from the bank and that those loans totaled $2.2 million, but he and Shebetich hid that from the other directors during their monthly meetings.

“There is no way he could not have known that the bank would fail,” Bloch said.

James Brink, Bernick's lawyer, argued that the government failed to prove his client's conduct led to the bank's failure or that he was responsible for the $9.4 million the FDIC lost and the nearly $500,000 lost by the 24 depositors.

“There is no nexus between his failure to repay these loans and the failure of the bank,” he said.

Schwab disagreed: “We all need to bear in mind that the defendant was found guilty of a crime, and the crime was not sloppy accounting.”

He agreed to let Bernick self-report to prison but placed him on home detention with electronic monitoring until he's told to report.

Brian Bowling is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 412-325-4301 or bbowling@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.