ShareThis Page

Pittsburgh rental property registry sails through first vote

| Wednesday, Dec. 9, 2015, 2:38 p.m.

Pittsburgh landlords would have to register leased properties with the city and purchase an annual permit costing $45 to $65 per unit under legislation council advanced Wednesday.

A landlord group has opposed the bill and promised to file a lawsuit to overturn it if it's enacted. Council is expected to take a final vote Tuesday.

Kevin Acklin, chief of staff for Mayor Bill Peduto, said the administration has amended the bill to address landlord concerns, adding that he believes it would withstand a court challenge.

He said it would help combat blight in the city caused by irresponsible landlords and has support from neighborhood improvement groups.

“What this does is provide an opportunity for the city to be more aggressive, to have more information, to have the resources, to hold bad landlords accountable, but at the same time provide a pathway for good landlords in terms of inspections and costs,” Acklin said.

Owners would pay $65 per unit for up to 10 units; $55 for 11 to 100 units; and $45 for more than 100. A previous version of the bill required a flat fee of $65 for each unit.

Access so the city could inspect the properties every three years would be required. Pittsburgh would cut fees in half after three years for units that pass a second inspection. Inspections for those units would occur every five years.

The bill requires owners to provide a way for the city to contact them or a legal representative.

John P. Kostelac, founder of Landlords Service Bureau Inc., which represents about 1,200 landlords, mainly from Allegheny and Westmoreland counties, said the legislation is unconstitutional and a revenue grab.

“None of those items we would approve, and we would continue our action before the courts,” Kostelac said.

The city projects $1.6 million in revenue from the permits. Acklin said the fees were implemented to cover the city's costs and would be reviewed next year and lowered if necessary.

The city's Department of Licenses, Permits and Inspections would manage the program. Acklin said the city would hire three inspectors to manage the program along with six current inspectors.

The bill passed a preliminary vote by 7-1 with Councilwoman Darlene Harris of Spring Hill against it because of potential litigation and Councilman Corey O'Connor of Swisshelm Park abstaining.

Council separately advanced an amendment to the city's housing discrimination ordinance that would require landlords to accept low-income tenants participating in the federal government's Housing Choice Voucher Program (Section 8). Under the amendment sponsored by Councilman Ricky Burgess of North Point Breeze, Section 8 participants could file a grievance with the city Human Relations Commission if they believe a landlord has denied them an apartment based on that rental subsidy.

Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-765-2312 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.