ShareThis Page

Vandergrift woman charged with firing shots

| Thursday, Jan. 21, 2016, 4:03 a.m.

A Vandergrift woman who allegedly fired a gun during a fight with her son sparked a standoff with police Wednesday night.

Vandergrift Patrolman Nate Rigatti said numerous witnesses reported hearing five or six gunshots from outside a home along 18th Street about 8:30 p.m.

The witnesses told police that Sue Ward, 45, had fired the shots from the porch of her home at 126 18th St., and that her son, Stefan Houser, 25, had been in the street at the time.

When police arrived, they heard movement in the house but no one would answer the door. So they set up a perimeter around the house with help from state police and police from neighboring communities.

Rigatti said Ward and Houser eventually surrendered on their own and were taken into custody without incident.

Police searched the home about 10:20 p.m. and found a .380-caliber handgun and one spent shell casing on the porch.

Ward reportedly admitted to police that she fired three to five shots outside the house. Rigatti said the shots were not believed to have hit anything.

He called Ward and her son “very uncooperative.”

Police charged Ward with reckless endangerment. Houser was charged with disorderly conduct.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a staff writer for the Tribune-Review. Reach him at 724-226-4701 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.