ShareThis Page

Proposed heart allocation rule aims to cut deaths among people on transplant wait list

Luis Fábregas
| Wednesday, Jan. 27, 2016, 5:12 p.m.

Transplant policymakers want to change the way donor hearts are allocated for transplantation, saying new distribution rules could reduce the number of people who die on the waiting list.

A proposal made public this week by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and United Network for Organ Sharing would broaden the geographic regions where candidates get offers for hearts and expand the listing categories that a patient can fall into when listed.

“The goals of our proposal were really to reduce the wait list mortality rates and particularly among the most urgent adult heart transplant candidates,” Dr. Joseph Rogers, chair of the OPTN/UNOS thoracic organ transplantation committee, said Wednesday. The committee is overseeing the proposed rule.

Rogers said the committee was motivated by the desire to identify people at the highest need “for this scarce resource.” More than 4,200 people nationwide are on the heart transplant wait list, according to UNOS data. In 2015, 350 people died while waiting for a heart, data show.

Under the new rules, people waiting for a donor heart would be placed in one of six categories, rather than the existing three, depending on how sick they are. The sickest would get top priority, followed by people who are more stable and possibly still at home.

The sickest would be able to get offers from more donors in broader geographic areas, Rogers said. If a candidate gets sicker while waiting, he or she can move up to a higher-priority category, just as they can under the current allocation system, he said.

Rogers, who is a professor of medicine and interim chair of the division of cardiology at Duke University Medical Center, said the changes would not affect patient survival after transplant surgery.

Two centers in Western Pennsylvania perform heart transplants: UPMC Presbyterian and Allegheny Health Network's Allegheny General Hospital . The centers belong to Region 2, one of 11 geographic regions created by UNOS to facilitate organ allocation. In 2015, centers in Region 2 performed 265 heart transplants.

The proposal is one of nine that UNOS made public on Monday.

UNOS wants people to provide feedback about the proposal and will accept comments on the OPTN website through March 25.

“We encourage any interested person or organization to review these policies and offer their thoughts, whether supporting or opposing the proposal,” said Joel Newman, a UNOS spokesman.

Newman said many proposals undergo substantial revisions before they are approved and implemented. It could take up to a year for the rules to become final.

The proposal applies only to adult transplant candidates, officials said.

It received the endorsement of Jim Gleason, a heart transplant recipient who sits on the OPTN/UNOS board.

“The new rules improve on the fairness of how hearts are allocated, with candidates in most need getting first access,” Gleason said.

Luis Fábregas is the Tribune-Review's medical editor. Reach him at 412-320-7998 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.