Philly Gas Works gets rate hike to replace dangerous lines
Philadelphia Gas Works expects to shave 40 years off its schedule to replace some of the oldest, most dangerous gas distribution pipes in the nation, thanks to a 2.5 percent rate increase approved Thursday by the state Public Utility Commission.
The commission voted 5-0 to allow the utility — the largest municipally owned gas utility in the country — to exceed the 5 percent surcharge it adds to customers' monthly bills to pay for infrastructure improvements. The new 7.5 percent rate will cut the utility's projected replacement timeline for its cast iron and bare, unprotected steel gas mains from 88 years to 48, utility spokesman Barry O'Sullivan stated.
The 2.5 percent rate increase will raise the typical monthly bill for the utility's 500,000 customers by about $1.65, O'Sullivan stated.
“There is no question that PGW needs to accelerate its main replacement program. The system is old and leaky and endangers the public safety,” Commissioner Robert F. Powelson said.
An award-winning Tribune-Review investigation, “Invisible Threat,” found that Philadelphia Gas Works' 1,500 miles of cast iron pipelines, the oldest and most leak-prone type of distribution pipe, account for about half of all the cast iron pipe in use in Pennsylvania.
Every other gas utility in the state planned to replace the last of its cast iron pipeline by 2047, the Trib noted. Philadelphia's timeline before the PUC rate increase stretched to 2100, meaning most people alive now would be dead before it was completed.
To read the Trib's “Invisible Threat” series, go online at: http://triblive.com/investigative/specialprojects/invisiblethreat/.
Mike Wereschagin is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7900 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.