53 people in Pennsylvania await Zika test results
Fifty-three Pennsylvanians are waiting to see whether they are infected with the mosquito-borne Zika virus, up from a dozen a week ago, the state Department of Health reported on its website Tuesday.
In Allegheny County, results are pending for 16 people, up from four a week ago, according to the county Health Department.
Wes Culp, a spokesman for the state Health Department, attributed the increase to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations to test asymptomatic pregnant women who have traveled to areas with ongoing Zika virus transmission.
“The surge is probably also due in part to increased awareness,” Culp said.
The CDC is performing the blood tests, which can take up to two weeks for results.
Worldwide, health authorities suspect the virus led to an increase in Brazil of microcephaly, in which children are born with abnormally small heads. As a result, the World Health Organization on Feb. 1 declared an international health emergency. The CDC advised pregnant women or those considering becoming pregnant to avoid travel to places with Zika outbreaks.
There's no vaccine for the virus, which spreads primarily through bites from a mosquito not typically found in Pennsylvania or Ohio.
The CDC said sexual transmission of the virus is possible, but mosquito bites remain the primary way Zika is transmitted. Zika has been found in the semen of infected men, and it's unknown how long it remains there, the CDC said last week.
The CDC also recommended that men who live in or have traveled to an area of Zika transmission and have a pregnant partner should abstain from sex or use condoms for the duration of the pregnancy.
Ben Schmitt is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7991 or firstname.lastname@example.org
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.