ShareThis Page

Money to expand rail service between Pittsburgh, Harrisburg not yet available

| Tuesday, Aug. 23, 2016, 2:30 p.m.

Just about everyone wants better passenger rail service from Pittsburgh to Harrisburg and beyond, but no one knows how to pay for it.

That was the takeaway from a state House Transportation Committee hearing held Tuesday at the David L. Lawrence Convention Center.

Local government officials and advocacy groups proposed expanding Pittsburgh-to-New York City passenger service through Harrisburg from one to three trains daily. But committee Chairman John Taylor, R-Philadelphia, said they need to pressure their legislators to back any funding plans that could make the expansion possible.

“Eventually, it will come down to how are we going to fund it,” Taylor said.

No funding proposals were discussed, and cost estimates were offered only in vague terms.

A Pittsburgh Downtown Partnership study referenced by several speakers put the expansion's annual operating cost at between $10.4 million and $12.8 million annually, including 30-year debt service on capital costs that could range between $37.4 million and $74.9 million.

Rudy Husband, resident vice president of government affairs of Norfolk Southern Railway, said those estimates failed to account for capacity upgrades that his company's tracks likely would require to accommodate added passenger rail traffic.

He said any passenger rail service growth on Norfolk Southern lines will first require an extensive operations feasibility study to determine, among other things, how more passenger trains would affect the railroad's freight operations.

“These studies, they're not cheap, and they take time,” Husband said. “At least a year, maybe more.”

For now, PennDOT and passenger rail operator Amtrak are working to develop a more comprehensive cost estimate. Ray Lang, Amtrak's Midwest senior director for state government relations, said officials hope to get a cost estimate to state lawmakers by the end of the year.

Passenger rail expansion advocates who spoke at the hearing cited decreased highway bridge and maintenance costs, improved air quality and better transportation options for seniors and students among the benefits of their proposal.

The Downtown Partnership estimates ridership would grow from 232,000 passengers annually to more than 414,000 if the expansion plan succeeds.

Michael Walton is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-380-5627 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.