ShareThis Page

Legionella discovered at SCI-Pittsburgh

Brian Bowling
| Thursday, Sept. 1, 2016, 4:15 p.m.
SCI Pittsburgh
SCI Pittsburgh
Chad Dion Lassiter, professor at University of Pennsylvania, (left) and Secretary of Corrections John Wetzel listen to a music performance by inmates at SCI Pittsburgh.
Donald Gilliland | Trib Total Media
Chad Dion Lassiter, professor at University of Pennsylvania, (left) and Secretary of Corrections John Wetzel listen to a music performance by inmates at SCI Pittsburgh.

SCI-Pittsburgh at Woods Run discovered higher than acceptable levels of Legionella bacteria in its water cooling tower and its medical building Monday, state prison officials said.

The agency is working with a private contractor and the state Department of Health to eliminate the problem, said Secretary John Wetzel.

“The Department of Corrections has been confronted with this issue at various prisons over the past years,” he said. “We take this matter seriously and are being proactive in our response to the water test results.”

Legionella is not spread person-to-person, so isolation and quarantine are not necessary, the agency said. The department has increased water testing at the facility.

People typically contract Leigonnaire's by breathing in water droplets contaminated with the bacteria, such as while taking a shower or drinking from a water fountain.

The prison has suspended showers in the medical building until all of the potential bacteria-harboring areas and fixtures are cleaned, said corrections spokeswoman Sue McNaughton. Showers in other areas and the water used for cooking weren't affected, she said.

The prison is providing bottled water to employees and inmates as a precaution, and no employees or inmates have been diagnosed with Legionnaire's disease, McNaughton said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.