TribLIVE

| News

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Pittsburgh lawyers' requests nixed in police brutality suit

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Monday, May 7, 2012, 6:16 p.m.
 

Lawyers who missed deadlines to request a psychological exam and witness interviews might have helped a Homewood man's police brutality lawsuit against their clients, but it's hard to gauge how much, two legal experts said on Monday.

Jordan Miles, 20, claims Pittsburgh police Officers Richard Ewing, Michael Saldutte and David Sisak beat him during a 2010 arrest. His civil lawsuit is scheduled for jury trial on July 16.

The city settled with Miles for $75,000 on his claims against the administration, but taxpayers remain on the hook for any monetary award Miles might win against the officers.

Lawyers for the city and the officers asked U.S. District Judge Gary Lancaster in March to compel Miles to undergo a mental examination by their expert psychologist, and sought grand jury testimony of two of Miles' friends.

Lancaster denied the requests, saying the attorneys missed an Oct. 1 deadline to request examinations and depose witnesses. The lawyers knew Miles' lawsuit claims the beating caused him psychological damage, and they knew his friends would be witnesses at trial, the judge said.

Attorney Bryan Campbell, who represents the officers, declined comment. The Tribune-Review couldn't reach Michael Kennedy, the city solicitor handling the case.

Bruce Antkowiak, a law professor at St. Vincent College near Latrobe who is not involved with the case, said the defense could call investigators to testify about what Miles' friends told them, and then compare that to their testimony at trial, so it's hard to estimate how much the ruling could hurt the defense.

"You can still get the impeachment," he said. "You just don't get it through the sworn testimony (of the two friends)."

David Harris, a University of Pittsburgh law professor, said judges tend to be tough about deadlines. In criminal cases, personal freedom is at stake; in civil cases, money.

"They either ignored the opportunities they had or made other choices," he said of the attorneys in the Miles case. "And when you do that, you have to live with the consequences."

Lancaster will allow Miles' attorneys to depose three private investigators the officers hired. The city lawyers didn't notify Miles' attorneys until March that they hired the investigators, so they couldn't conduct the interviews before the deadline, the judge ruled.

J. Kerrington Lewis, one of Miles' attorneys, said the judge's reasoning was "pretty straightforward."

"From all appearances, this case is going to trial," he said. "I don't see any other course at this point."

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Allegheny

  1. Peduto blasts Wolf’s plan to borrow $3B to shore up pensions
  2. Newsmaker: Stephanie McMahon
  3. Derry boy recovering at home after high-profile intestinal transplant
  4. Pittsburgh is planning to add network of bike lanes through Oakland
  5. Central Catholic High School class celebrates 65 years of bond
  6. Amtrak still working to add bicycle racks to Western Pa. train routes
  7. School credit ratings a problem for several in Western Pennsylvania
  8. Rising East Liberty out of reach for Pittsburgh’s poor
  9. Brookline seniors to get update on bedbug infestation
  10. Former Penn Hills football player found not guilty of homicide
  11. W.Va. authorities charge 87 with drug trafficking