Share This Page

Newsmaker: Moni McIntyre

| Tuesday, Sept. 18, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
Caption info: Moni McIntyre served as a panelist for a Sept. 11 commemorative conference at the Smithsonian Institution. The Sisters of Selma conference devoted discussion to six Roman Catholic nuns who marched in protest against the brutal beatings of non-violent social justice protestors in Selma, Ala., on March 7, 1965. She is rector of the Episcopal Church of the Holy Cross in Homewood, and assistant professor in the Graduate Center for Social and Public Policy at Duquesne University.

Noteworthy: Panelist for the Sisters of Selma conference at the Smithsonian Institution, a discussion by six Roman Catholic nuns who marched in protest against the brutal beatings of non-violent protesters in Selma, Ala., on March 7, 1965.

Age: 64

Residence: Oakland

Occupation: Assistant professor in the Graduate Center for Social and Public Policy at Duquesne University and rector of the Episcopal Church of the Holy Cross in Homewood.

Education: Master's in English from Eastern Michigan University; master's in religious studies from the University of Windsor, Ontario; master's in divinity from SS. Cyril & Methodius Seminary in Orchard Lake, Mich.; doctorate in moral theology/Christian ethics from the University of St. Michael's College at the University of Toronto.

Background: Served in the Navy from 1979 to 2008, retiring as a captain; was a nun from 1966-98, before she was ordained as an Episcopal priest in 2000. She regularly teaches physicians, dentists and other health care professionals at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Md.

Quote: "The best part of the whole day was being on the panel with 88-year-old Sister Antona Ebo, the African-American sister who was in the 1965 march, and Dr. Cedric Bright, current president of the National Medical Association. It was all of my lives coming together."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.