Newsmaker: David A. Harris
The YWCA of Greater Pittsburgh selected Pitt Law School Professor David A. Harris as a 2012 Racial Justice Awardee in the legal category. He will be recognized at the 21st annual Racial Justice Awards banquet on Nov. 14 at the Westin Hotel and Convention Center, Downtown.
David A. Harris
Noteworthy: The YWCA of Greater Pittsburgh selected Harris as a winner in the 2012 Racial Justice Awards in the legal category. He will be recognized at a banquet on Nov. 14 at the Westin Hotel and Convention Center, Downtown.
Residence: Point Breeze
Family: Wife, Rebecca; children, Alicia, 22, and Sam, 19
Background: Harris studies, writes and teaches about police behavior and regulation, law enforcement and national security issues and the law at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. His work focuses on racial profiling and search and seizure; he also works with police and community groups. Before he began teaching in 1990, Harris was a public defender in the D.C. area, a litigator at a law firm in Philadelphia and law clerk to federal Judge Walter K. Stapleton in Wilmington, Del.
Education: Bachelor's degree from Northwestern University, law degree from Yale Law School and master's degree in law from Georgetown University.
Quote: “Moving our country closer to the goal of racial justice and equality is an issue for every American, not just those who are members of minority groups. Working on racial profiling and other issues of racial justice has given me the chance to help move us closer to our American ideals.”
— Adam Brandolph
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.