ShareThis Page

J'Burgh named top innovator for Jewish networking

| Monday, Nov. 5, 2012, 12:02 a.m.
Jasmine Goldband
David Katz, 30, is the director of J'Burgh, designed to serve the needs of the approximately 2,500 Jewish graduate students and young professionals in their twenties living in Pittsburgh. Jasmine Goldband | Tribune-Review
Jasmine Goldband
David Katz, 30, (left) the director of J'Burgh, looks through marketing materials for upcoming events with Annie Lascoe, 25, the Janet L Swanson director of Jewish student life for the University of Pittsburgh and Aharon David, 27, the Herman and Helen Lipsitz Jewish agency Israel fellow while working at their office in North Oakland. J'Burgh is designed to serve the needs of the approximately 2,500 Jewish graduate students and young professionals in their twenties living in Pittsburgh. Jasmine Goldband | Tribune-Review
Submitted photoBryon Miller, left, and Evan Goldstein, right, members of the Jewish young adults group J’Burgh, make “Sock Monkeys” to donate to Children’s Hospital.

An organization that builds networks among young adults in Pittsburgh can call itself one of the country's most innovative Jewish groups.

J'Burgh is to be included in the 2012-13 Slingshot Guide, an annual list of 50 forward-thinking organizations published by the Slingshot Fund, a New York-based nonprofit. This is the first time a Pittsburgh group made the list. The guide started in 2005.

“These are the organizations that are making Jewish life relevant today,” said Slingshot director Will Schneider.

About 190 groups applied to be in the guide. The third time was the charm for J'Burgh.

“It's a huge honor,” said David Katz, 30, director of the five-year-old initiative of Hillel Jewish University Center of Pittsburgh. “It's one thing to be recognized in Pittsburgh. It's another thing to be recognized nationally.”

J'Burgh, based in Oakland, formed in 2007 with support from Shalom Pittsburgh and the Jewish Healthcare Foundation. Its mission is to use Judaism to engage the city's about 2,500 Jewish graduate students and young professionals and help keep them in Pittsburgh.

Loosely modeled after a Jewish young-adult group in Seattle, J'Burgh found a way to connect to twentysomethings in Pittsburgh. That included social and communal components and job and internship opportunities, said Aaron Weil, executive director of Hillel JUC.

“Engaging young Jewish adults isn't a problem unique just to Pittsburgh,” Weil said. “It's a problem in every community in the country.”

Schneider said J'Burgh can serve as a model for those communities.

“This is a problem sitting right in front of our faces, and J'Burgh offers a simple solution,” he said.

J'Burgh attracted about 900 people this year to its programs, many designed around social functions such as softball and kickball games, happy hour gatherings and Friday night dinners. It holds events five or six nights a week.

But more than the organization's ability to draw people to its functions helped it gain recognition. J'Burgh connected young Jewish adults on a scale that had not happened before, Schneider said.

“It's not because J'Burgh had a great bowling night,” he said. “It's what you do and what the change in the world is because of it. That's what J'Burgh does: It changes Jewish life in Pittsburgh.”

J'Burgh faces challenges, including sustaining its growth and providing depth to complement the breadth of its programming, its leaders said.

“We need to develop leadership for the future of the community,” Katz said. “It's very important that J'Burgh takes people in their early 20s and then passes them on to other organizations as active leaders in the Jewish community.”

Jason Cato is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7936 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.