Franco Harris continues to pursue his pro-Paterno crusade
Former Pittsburgh Steeler Franco Harris said on Saturday that he may hit the road with town hall meetings to scrutinize former FBI Director Louis Freeh's investigation into how Penn State handled the Jerry Sandusky sex abuse scandal and how the case affected the legacy of former Nittany Lions head football coach Joe Paterno.
About 140 people crowded into the Harris Theater, Downtown, on Saturday to listen to an analysis of the report prepared by Freeh's law firm and the grand jury presentment that led to sexual assault charges against retired Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky.
“I don't think it's ever too late to seek the truth and to inform people of the truth or to let them see a totally different viewpoint than what was presented a year ago,” Harris said.
Harris has been highly critical of the Freeh report. The NCAA, after viewing the Freeh report, levied harsh sanctions against Penn State, including voiding 111 of Paterno's wins from 1998 through 2011.
A representative for the Freeh group declined to comment on Harris' town hall meeting.
In June, a Centre County jury convicted Sandusky for sexually abusing boys for 15 years, and he was sentenced to 30 to 60 years in state prison.
Harris said he wanted to gauge the reaction of Saturday's meeting before deciding whether he would host more, but he said was pleased with the turnout and the discussion.
“It feels good,” Harris said on Saturday. “We'll see.”
Several people at the town hall meeting said they were grateful to Harris for standing firm in his defense of Paterno and criticism of the report and vowed to back him.
“I saw Franco out there by himself, and I thought he needed support,” said Anthony Lubrano, who began serving on the university board of trustees in July. “I think what Franco has done is heroic.”
Bill Vidonic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5621 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.