Share This Page

Constance 'Connie' Parker elected president of NAACP's Pittsburgh branch

| Thursday, Nov. 15, 2012, 12:02 a.m.

Penn Hills resident Constance “Connie” Parker will become the second woman to lead the NAACP's Pittsburgh branch in the nearly 100-year-old history of the civil rights group.

Parker, 70, won 171 votes Tuesday to become president-elect of the Hill District branch founded in 1915.

Deborah Walker, 57, of Allentown and Regina Ragin Dykes, 68, of East Liberty received 145 votes and 16 votes, respectively, said Secretary Imogene Hines, 63, of Ross.

Parker, the branch's first vice president for eight years, will succeed M. Gayle Moss, 71, of Wilkins, who did not seek re-election after eight years in office.

Five other officers were elected or re-elected: Charlene McAbee, 66, of Churchill, as first vice president; Squirrel Hill resident Marilyn Barnett Waters, 65, second vice president; Johnnie Miott, 73, of Stanton Heights, third vice president; Findlay resident Anita Walker, secretary; and Morton Stanfield Jr., 33, of Friendship, treasurer.

Thirteen people were elected to the executive committee, which can have up to 24 members.

Hines said 332 members of the branch voted. The two-year terms for officers and committee members begin in January.

Tory N. Parrish is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-5662 or tparrish@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.