TribLIVE

| News

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Residents oppose plan for restrictions on Parkway East on-ramps

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

By Tom Fontaine and Tory N. Parrish
Friday, Nov. 16, 2012, 9:24 p.m.
 

Residents in some neighborhoods off the Parkway East want PennDOT to put the brakes on a proposal to place traffic signals on several on-ramps and close others during rush hours to reduce congestion.

“It would restrict us from getting to the parkway, but put no restrictions on people who live farther east,” said Alina Keebler, president of the Regent Square Civic Association, which sent emails to about 300 of its members Friday soliciting questions and concerns to share with PennDOT.

A University of Pittsburgh study done in March 2011 recommended closing the ramp from South Braddock Avenue to the Parkway East inbound during the morning rush and the South Braddock ramp to the highway's outbound lanes in the evening.

“It's unfair. Why should we be penalized?” Keebler said.

The state has set aside $5 million for the proposed ramp-control project, which the Pitt study recommended as a way to improve traffic flow on the notoriously congested Parkway East. The money is earmarked for 2016.

But PennDOT officials insist they haven't decided whether to pursue the project. Rather, the Pitt study is prompting the agency to hire a consultant to do a more in-depth review of the entire Parkway East corridor and its surrounding communities. PennDOT has yet to hire a consultant, officials said.

“Certainly, we hear the residents loud and clear about access to the parkway,” said Dan Cessna, chief engineer for PennDOT's District 11, which includes Allegheny, Beaver and Lawrence counties.

“What I want to make clear is that no final decisions have been made with regard to any ramp meters (signals) being put in place or any ramp closures,” Cessna said, adding the consultant might discourage signals but recommend other traffic improvements.

Among the Pitt study's recommendations, ramps from southbound South Braddock Avenue and southbound Ardmore Boulevard to the Parkway East inbound would close during morning rush, while traffic signals would control access to ramps from northbound Ardmore Boulevard and westbound Greensburg Pike to the highway's inbound lanes. The signals would be timed to allow vehicles onto the highway every few seconds.

Tom Fontaine and Tory N. Parrish are staff writers for Trib Total Media.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Allegheny

  1. Rising East Liberty out of reach for Pittsburgh’s poor
  2. Bill seeks to give Pittsburgh police license plate info
  3. Beating victim from McKees Rocks recalled as skilled family man
  4. Tablets for Allegheny County Jail inmates deemed a success
  5. Western Pa.’s ties to 2016 White House race extend beyond Santorum
  6. Water line bursts at Allegheny General Hospital
  7. $1B rapid bridge replacement across Pa. aims for savings, safety
  8. Filing in Scaife case challenges subpoena request by his children
  9. Child falls through window in Marshall-Shadeland, taken to Children’s
  10. Newsmaker: Kathryn Jolley
  11. Former Steelers lineman Hartings to be honored for youth volunteering