Free parking after 6 p.m. proposed for Pittsburgh
City Council voted Tuesday to consider legislation that would free drivers from ever again having to plug a parking meter in Pittsburgh after 6 p.m.
Councilman Bill Peduto, who sponsored the legislation, said evening parking enforcement hurts small, neighborhood businesses that depend on customers who park at metered spaces.
Council in 2010 extended meter enforcement hours to 10 p.m. Downtown and in Shadyside, Squirrel Hill, Oakland, the North Shore, South Side and Strip District to generate more revenue. Reacting to public outcry last year, members amended the legislation temporarily, returning enforcement to between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. through this year.
Enforcement in the seven neighborhoods is set to extend again to 10 p.m. starting in January. Council plans a preliminary vote next week on Peduto's proposal to permanently end nighttime enforcement.
In other action, council passed legislation that:
• Creates the Department of Equal Opportunity Review and commits money for the purchase of software to allow the department to accurately track minority- and female-owned business participation in city contracts. The legislation establishes the position of director, who will be paid $70,000 to $90,000, and enables the department to penalize contractors who violate quotas.
• Commits $250,000 for a study of racial and gender inequalities in Pittsburgh.
• Approves the $360,000 purchase of a building on Broadway Avenue in Beechview for a senior center. The city intends to renovate the building and estimates total costs at $3 million.
Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-765-2312 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.