ShareThis Page

Corbett: State must address pension issues

| Wednesday, Dec. 5, 2012, 12:22 a.m.
Gov. Tom Corbett visits the Tribune Review's editorial board on Tuesday, December 4, 2012. 
Justin Merriman | Tribune-Review
Justin Merriman | Tribune-Review
Gov. Tom Corbett visits the Tribune Review's editorial board on Tuesday, December 4, 2012. Justin Merriman | Tribune-Review

With Pennsylvania facing a crisis from spiraling public pension costs, Republican Gov. Tom Corbett on Tuesday outlined potential fixes he will offer to legislative leaders in January before presenting his 2013 state budget.

Corbett told the Tribune-Review, sister paper of The Valley Independent, that options include increasing the state retirement age, which varies by agency, and changing how pension benefits are calculated by not including overtime and adding lower-salaried years into the formula.

Any changes would start with new employees but, if he can get lawmakers to agree, could include workers who haven't put in the 10 years required to become vested in the system.

Making changes won't fix the problem in the short term but the state cannot afford to postpone action any longer, Corbett said. As pension costs rise — state payments are due to increase by $511 million next year — other items in the budget will get squeezed.

“Everything is being somewhat driven by what the effect of the pension is,” Corbett said. “People need to know why this is an issue.”

The Budget Office projects a $41 billion unfunded liability for the pension systems that include teachers and state workers. Trying to cut pension costs would pit Corbett against public-sector unions, which are among the state's most influential interest groups. Corbett, however, said the first hurdle is the Republican-controlled General Assembly.

Asked whether he plans to confront labor groups more directly in the next two years, Corbett said: “We are going to work and see what we can get through the Legislature. That's my answer.”

The spokesman for House Republicans said Corbett should have met with lawmakers before making public his concern about pension costs.

“I wish he would talk to the leaders before he goes to the press with it,” said House GOP spokesman Steve Miskin.

The Governor's office issued a recent report citing “staggering” pension costs that more than doubled in the past two years. Pensions for state and school employees cost taxpayers $1.5 billion this year and will rise to $2.2 billion in 2013 and $5.16 billion in 2019-20, Budget Secretary Charles Zogby said.

“We've already made significant changes to the pension system in 2010,” said Sen. Jay Costa, D-Forest Hills. Those include increased payments and retirement ages.

Corbett should allow those changes to have an effect, said Richard Bloomingdale, president of the Pennsylvania AFL-CIO, who called the debate a “phony crisis.”

State leaders caused a pension funding shortfall during the past 12 years, when a series of laws increased benefits while decreasing funding, Costa said.

Pennsylvania State Education Association spokesman Wythe Keever compared that to someone who “owned a credit card and didn't make payments on it for 12 years.” Cutting up the card won't eliminate the debt, said Keever.

Keever said Corbett could satisfy the pension liability by increasing taxes on corporations. Corbett said tax hikes are out of the question. If costs don't come down, money would have to come from education and welfare spending, he said — two of the largest line items in the general fund.

The Fraternal Order of Police, which endorsed Corbett's 2010 campaign, would oppose proposals to cut benefits, said state FOP president Les Neri. Police retire earlier than most public employees and don't have as much time to build a nest egg, said Neri, whose 40,000-member organization has 6,000 people in the state pension system. Raising the retirement age would be a mistake, he said.

“A violent criminal in his 20s or early 30s being pursued by a 58-year-old, gray-haired police officer — I don't think that's what we have in mind when we're talking about public safety,” Neri said.

Corbett did not reject the idea of floating bonds to cushion the financial impact, though he did not embrace the idea.

Rather than asking legislative leaders to help with a plan, Corbett should devise one and present it to the General Assembly, said Sam DeMarco, a conservative activist and president of the Moon group Veterans & Patriots United.

“He's going to sit down and try to gauge their opinion on what they believe they can get done from a political perspective, yet nowhere here is a solution presented,” DeMarco said.

Senate Majority Leader Dominic Pillegi, R-Delaware County, sponsored Sen. Pat Browne's bill to transfer new employees to a direct contribution plan.

“We plan to introduce that bill again in the new session and will work with Gov. Corbett, House leaders, and (Democrats) to implement a plan that addresses all of the pension issues,” said Pileggi's spokesman, Erik Arneson.

Brad Bumsted and Mike Wereschagin are staff writers for Trib Total Media. Bumsted can be reached at Wereschagin can be reached at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.