TribLIVE

| News


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Variances OK'd for Strip project

Daily Photo Galleries

Thursday, Dec. 13, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
 

Pittsburgh City Council on Wednesday likely ended a six-month standoff with Buncher Co. over zoning for a $400 million development proposed for the Strip District.

Council gave preliminary approval to legislation that would permit Buncher to exceed building density and height limitations, among other things, on its 55-acre property. The site consists mainly of vacant parking lots between 11th and 21st streets, from Smallman Street to the Allegheny River.

“We're pleased that it passed, but it's only one step in a long process,” said Thomas J. Balestrieri, Buncher's president and CEO.

The legislation resolves a point of controversy over how much space Buncher should provide between the development and the Allegheny River. A compromise amendment proposed with Buncher's blessing requires the company to provide 70 feet of space — 75 feet between the Veterans Bridge and 16th Street.

City regulations require just 50 feet, although critics wanted the company to provide 95 feet, saying that would allow restoration of the river edge to its natural gradual slope and provide enough room for a park, walking trail and wildlife habitat.

Buncher plans 11 structures including residential, office and retail space with landscaping, the trail and park, and a wide boulevard along 17th Street, ending at a riverfront plaza the size of Market Square. It also includes partial demolition and renovation of the historic Produce Terminal on Smallman.

Council split on the legislation 5-4 with Patrick Dowd, Natalia Rudiak, Bruce Kraus and Bill Peduto voting no.

In an impassioned speech, Dowd urged council to reject the bill, calling the development the “essence of mediocrity.”

“It is nothing more than a gated community in the Strip District that blocks public access,” he said. “We are accepting nothing more than mediocre.”

Council President Darlene Harris, who voted for the bill, said she hoped to persuade Buncher to provide more space along the river for public use.

“This property does not belong to the city of Pittsburgh. This property belongs to the Buncher Co.,” she said. “I wish we could have had 95 feet. We can't force them into what maybe we would like.”

Council is expected to approve the legislation in a final vote next week, but that won't end the controversy over the development.

Buncher is seeking a $50 million tax-increment financing plan in which the city would use extra property taxes generated by the development to repay loans for such items as water and sewer lines.

Dowd has refused to introduce TIF legislation. The legislation falls under the Intergovernmental Affairs Committee, which Dowd chairs.

“I'm still holding the TIF (bill),” Dowd said. Buncher hasn't said whether the TIF is a deal-breaker.

Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

 

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Allegheny

  1. 2 Oakland houses destroyed by fire; none hurt
  2. Google grants teachers’ school supply wishes
  3. Controller to examine how much vehicles cost Allegheny County
  4. Diocese of Pittsburgh plans service in response to black mass
  5. Coach accused in $2,400 theft from Baldwin Hockey Club
  6. Backers of airport trade center look for more funding
  7. Bethel Park settled police officer’s suit for $25,000
  8. State lawmakers delay hearings on Corbett’s review of academic standards
  9. Parents keep children home from Brookline schools over threats
  10. Number of jobs in high-tech industry outpace workers in Pittsburgh, nation
  11. Latest flu vaccines offer protection from 4 influenza strains instead of traditional 3
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.