Feds weigh plan to ship fracking waste
Shale gas drillers want to ship their chemical-laden wastewater by river barge but they need federal officials to decide whether to allow it.
The Coast Guard commander overseeing a risk-assessment of the idea says a decision should come soon.
“I'm trying to pressure to get this quickly resolved — so that everyone can do this or not (do it) — just so we have some finality to it,” Cmdr. Michael Roldan said in a phone interview from Washington headquarters, adding that he doesn't know how long the review will take.
Several companies are interested in bulk barge shipments of hydraulic fracturing and drilling wastewater to out-of-state disposal sites, several business and government officials said. The Coast Guard, which regulates the nation's waterways, has final approval and must finish assessing the risk posed by carcinogens, pollutants and radioactive particles in the waste.
Environmentalists said the possibility of a spill that could contaminate Pittsburgh-area rivers isn't worth the risk. A barge accident would be a “massive catastrophe,” said Steve Hvozdovich, Marcellus campaign coordinator for Clean Water Action, a national environmental advocacy organization.
Diesel, gasoline, benzene and chlorine, among many other chemicals, are already shipped in bulk on the nation's rivers, said Peter Stephaich, chairman of Campbell Transportation in Houston, Washington County. Shale drilling wastewater is shipped by truck and rail, which could expedite its approval for river shipping, Roldan said.
“I know this is sort of an emotional, sensitive issue, but ... this water is already moving, it's just a matter of how they're going to move,” Stephaich said.
Two or three companies contacted Campbell about shipping well wastewater by barge and it is ready to do the work with an OK from the Coast Guard, he added.
Coast Guard chemical engineers completed their assessment, in the works for years, said Roldan, chief of the Coast Guard's hazardous materials division. Now they're working with superiors at the Coast Guard and the Department of Homeland Security and officials from other federal departments to review that assessment. President Obama's special panel of shale gas advisers is likely to look at it, too, Roldan said.
“I think the engineering provides its own appropriate answers,” he added when asked why he'd like to see a quick resolution. “For the most part, it's a very cold calculation, very straightforward engineering calculations. What this cargo brings in is more sensitivity about natural gas extraction activity. That's way beyond my realm of influence or even interest.”
Roldan declined to say what the initial calculations showed. Several of the business and government officials on the Port of Pittsburgh Commission board said they expect the Coast Guard to approve the shipments, maybe within a few months. A few expressed frustration with the length of the review, but it is standard to involve several federal departments, Roldan and commission Executive Director James McCarville said.
There's been some confusion at ports in Pittsburgh, West Virginia and Ohio about the issue.
John Jack, vice president of business development and operations for GreenHunter Water, a company that handles wastewater for major oil and gas companies, said “nobody told us that we couldn't” move shale wastewater by barge.
GreenHunter was planning to start using barges before the end of the year because they believed the process was allowed, Jack said.
Some commission members said it was important for government officials to avoid rushing any decision.
State Sen. Jim Ferlo, D-Highland Park, asked McCarville to add the issue to the commission's next board meeting, including consideration of a public hearing.
“I found it incredulous that private industry had already secured property and may have actually started this activity without any governmental approval or notification,” Ferlo said in a memo. “I do not support the barging of so-called frack water ... .”
The Associated Press contributed to this report. Timothy Puko is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7991 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- City’s plan for Strip flummoxes vendors
- Family becomes ‘forever’
- City of Pittsburgh detective, 2 boys finalize adoption before judge
- Orders for Pittsburgh police hats soar with new uniform policy
- Judge denies request to lift gag order in Ford case
- Marshall land parcel along Route 910 eyed as park site
- CDC backlog means W.Pa, likely won’t get respiratory virus diagnoses quickly
- Local groups hope NFL lends support
- Embattled VFW mulls image among declining numbers
- Google grants teachers’ school supply wishes
- State lawmakers delay hearings on Corbett’s review of academic standards