Man arrested in Heinz Field break-in
A man dressed in gray sweatpants and a Pirates cap broke into Heinz Field on Saturday morning, wandered the turf and tried to force his way into the Steelers' locker room with a hammer, according to police.
A surveillance video captured parts of the break-in — the second at the North Shore stadium since 2010.
Pittsburgh police officers responding to a call for a burglary in progress found John Winters, 28, of Hubbard Street, Brighton Heights, standing in a hallway near the damaged locker room door with the hammer, according to court documents.
Winters entered Heinz Field through Gate B by breaking a lock, the court documents stated. A door at Gate B had pry marks, police said.
Winters was charged with burglary and possessing an instrument of crime and taken to the Allegheny County Jail. A preliminary hearing is scheduled for 8 a.m. Wednesday.
On May 23, 2010, three men were arrested by Pittsburgh police after two of them scaled a fence at Gate A to get into the stadium.
Shazad Mehta of Elmhurst, Ill., and Neville Noshir Medhora of Austin, Texas, pleaded guilty to entering Heinz Field while Adil Minocherhomjee of La Jolla, Calif., remained outside.
Medhora said they had attended a wedding at Heinz Field a few hours earlier but were not permitted on the field. Hours later, they were walking by the stadium and thought they could run in and take a photograph.
The trio pleaded guilty and was ordered to pay a fine and court costs.
Tony LaRussa and Bill Vidonic are staff writers for Trib Total Media. LaRussa can be reached at 412-320-7987 or email@example.com. Vidonic can be reached at 412-380-5621or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.