No set policy for city police on 'unknown trouble' calls
Pittsburgh police do not have a specific policy on how officers should handle “unknown trouble” calls such as the one at the center of a murder-suicide investigation.
City officials declined to discuss the case on Monday while police, the district attorney and a review board investigate.
“Their policies and procedures aren't that detailed,” said Elizabeth Pittinger, director of the Citizen Police Review Board. She said the lack of a policy leaves officers with discretion. “They don't have to have step-by-step instruction, do they?”
Police are investigating whether two officers followed proper procedure on Dec. 31 when they answered a 911 call for help from a woman in her Larimer home. Officers Louis Schweitzer and Lance Hoyson left after speaking to a man, through a window, who said everything was fine and refused to let them in.
The next day, police found Ka'Sandra Wade, 33, fatally shot inside the Lowell Street home after her family called with concerns for her safety. During a standoff on Wednesday with police, her boyfriend, Anthony L. Brown, 51, wrote notes to officers admitting to killing Wade and saying they could have done more to save her. Police believe Brown was the man at the window on Lowell Street. He killed himself during the standoff at his Point Breeze apartment.
Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. said he is reviewing the incident but declined further comment. His office received 911 records, which the city did not release to reporters.
Wade's mother, Sharon Jordan of Aliquippa, said she's looking for an attorney to explore a possible lawsuit against the city.
Police spokeswoman Diane Richard said “the incident is under a homicide/internal investigation and no statements will be made regarding any inquiries into this matter.”
Schweitzer and Hoyson could not be reached. Investigators interviewed them on Thursday, said Bryan Campbell, attorney for Fraternal Order of Police Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1, who was present for the interviews. He would not say what was discussed.
“This is not uncommon,” Campbell said. “They basically are doing an internal investigation.”
County spokeswoman Amie Downs said a review by officials who run the 911 center “indicates that all policies and procedures that are in place for dispatchers were followed.”
Wade told a 911 call-taker that she needed police to come to her house, investigators said. As the call-taker asked for more information, there was commotion and an apparent struggle that ended with the line going dead, police said.
Dispatchers sent Schweitzer and Hoyson to the home on what police refer to as an “unknown trouble” call. After Brown turned them away, the officers asked dispatchers to call Wade back. They didn't hear a phone ring and left, investigators said.
State police have specific regulations regarding such 911 hang-up calls that require more investigation by responding officers.
“We give these calls high priority,” said Trooper Adam Reed, a department spokesman. “We never know what we're getting into when we're responding to these. We don't know if it's something as simple as a child playing around with a phone, or if it's a very serious call. We certainly don't take any of these lightly.”
The regulations require troopers to look for signs of a disturbance or if someone at the home is nervous or disheveled, but “a lot will come down to officer discretion because no two calls are exactly the same,” Reed said.
The regulations are in place in part as a “good reminder not to get lax with these calls,” he said.
Pittinger said she will present her findings to the review board at its Jan. 22 meeting. The board can recommend nonbinding discipline to Chief Nate Harper.
Staff writer Bobby Kerlik contributed to this report. Margaret Harding is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-8519 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Security policies limit ‘insider threat’ at airports, TSA says
- Newsmaker: John Carson
- SWAT incident in Ross ends peacefully
- Pet chiropractic more popular in Western Pa., but doubts linger
- Pittsburgh police chief finds use-of-force policies ‘quite satisfactory’
- Suspect in Glassport man’s shooting death put on house arrest
- Buffalo man killed by truck in the West End Circle wanted ‘a fresh start’
- Maryland man found with missing Ohio girl in Pittsburgh motel
- Attorney wants evidence from South Allegheny teacher’s cellphone thrown out
- Pittsburgh on cusp of leaving fiscal oversight
- In letter, Plum school superintendent reassures parents on safety