Teacher evaluation study eyed in Pittsburgh
Teachers get better information on how they are doing in class when districts measure performance using a combination of student achievement on state tests, student surveys and classroom observations, according to a study released on Tuesday.
Paid for by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the three-year Measures of Effective Teaching project found that the best teacher evaluation is based one-third to one-half on state test scores and the rest on classroom observations and student surveys.
“This latest release continues to confirm that we are following the right path,” said Sam Franklin, executive director of the Office of Teacher Effectiveness for Pittsburgh Public Schools.
More than 100 teachers from Pittsburgh were among 3,000 teachers who volunteered for the study. Others come from Charlotte, Dallas, Denver, Memphis, New York City and Tampa.
The study, the final to be issued, found using state achievement tests, classroom observations and student surveys predicted teachers' success far better than having a master's degree or years of teaching experience.
Pittsburgh Public Schools wants to use a model that is half based on classroom observations, 30 percent on how the teacher's students improve on state tests, 15 percent on student surveys and 5 percent on school results. The city school board will vote on that approach Jan. 23.
Starting in 2013-14, state law requires districts to base half of teachers' evaluations on classroom observations and half on student outcomes.
Bill Zlatos is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7828 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.