Police get fire investigators' report on deadly North Braddock blaze
Allegheny County fire investigators have completed their examination of the North Braddock fire that killed 3-year-old twin boys but won't say what caused the fire until homicide detectives complete their work.
Dental records were used Tuesday to confirm the identities of the boys as Ky'Heir D. Arthur and Dy'Heir Arthur, a spokesman for the Medical Examiner's Office said.
Relatives and friends of the family have said the boys' mother, Dalawna Berran-Lett, 32, told them she left the boys home alone for a brief time Friday afternoon to look for her 15-year-old daughter who did not come directly home from school. She said she returned to find the house at the corner of 13th Street and Rebecca Avenue in flames.
Alvin Henderson, the county's chief of emergency services, said fire investigators completed their work Tuesday and turned the results over to Allegheny County Police.
“Because of the ongoing investigation, there will be no further information or comment provided at this time,” Henderson said.
Police and a spokesman for District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. could not be reached for comment.
The heaviest damage appeared to be in the rear of the two-story house.
Investigators have said that Dy'Heir — who died of burns and smoke inhalation — was found in the kitchen on the first floor in the rear of the house. Ky'Heir — who died of smoke inhalation and carbon monoxide poisoning — was found in a second-floor bedroom.
Visitation for the boys is scheduled from 2 to 6 p.m. Friday at the Odell Robinson Funeral Home, 2025 Perrysville Ave., North Side. Services are scheduled for 11 a.m. Saturday at the Christian Missionary Baptist Church, 344 Hale St., Homewood.
Michael Hasch is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7820 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.