CCAC outlines qualities for emeritus honors
The Community College of Allegheny County on Thursday has come up with a way to honor long-serving former trustees and retired presidents.
The board of trustees voted unanimously to approve a resolution outlining qualifications for conferring emeritus honors. The board also voted to bestow the first title on former trustee William Russell Robinson.
“The trustees felt that creating the policy is a way to recognize board members and retired presidents who have made unique contributions to the college,” said David Hoovler, a CCAC spokesman. “This also gives us a way to allow these people a more formal way to remain affiliated with the college.”
Emeritus status may be conferred on trustees and presidents who “achieved a record of distinction,” according to the measure.
To be eligible, trustees must serve at least two six-year terms; a college president must serve for at least eight years.
Emeritus trustees will have their names included in all trustee publications and on a plaque in the board room. Emeritus presidents will receive their own plaque and be invited to all of the college's activities and special events.
Robinson, 70, of the Hill District served as a trustee from 1997 to 2012 and was board chair during his last two years. He said he was unaware the board was planning to recognize him.
“I'm really surprised,” said Robinson, a member of Allegheny County Council. “I didn't join the board because I wanted something; I joined because I wanted to give something. I am very honored.”
Tony LaRussa is a staff writerfor Trib Total Media. He canbe reached at 412-320-7987or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.