Newsmaker: Michael Clark
Michael Clark, 36, a reservist from Ross, oversaw installation and setup at the Fisher House, a new $5.5 million lodge free for families of veterans receiving care at the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System‘s University Drive Campus.Noteworthy: Clark oversaw installation and setup at the Fisher House, a new $5.5 million lodge free for families of veterans receiving care at the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System‘s University Drive Campus. Age: 36Residence: Clark is from Ross, but is now on temporary military assignment abroad.Occupation: He is an active-duty reservist in the Pennsylvania Army National Guard, 2nd Brigade Infantry Combat Team, 28th Infantry Division.
Noteworthy: Clark oversaw the opening of the Fisher House, a new $5.5 million lodge free for families of veterans receiving care at the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System‘s University Drive Campus.
Residence: Ross (Now on temporary military assignment abroad)
Occupation: He is an active-duty reservist in the Pennsylvania Army National Guard, 2nd Brigade Infantry Combat Team, 28th Infantry Division
Background: Clark served in Bosnia from 1995 to 1996 and in Afghanistan from 2005 to 2006. He joined the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System in 2011 to help coordinate that year's National Veterans Wheelchair Games, which drew more than 550 athletes to Pittsburgh. He is expected to rejoin the system as manager of the Fisher House when he returns from his mission, although hospital officials don't know when that will be
Education: Bachelor's degree from Penn State University in 2002
Quote: “The Fisher House gives our military heroes the priceless gift of having family close at hand as they heal and recover at VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System.”
— Tim Puko
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.