Computer error misprints about 500 Pennsylvania birth certificates
About 500 new Pennsylvanians will get the wrong answer to the question “Who's your Daddy?” if they rely on their misprinted birth certificates.
A computer glitch caused the problem when the state Division of Vital Records transitioned to new records software, officials said.
The problem affected about 500 birth certificates, said department spokeswoman Holli Senior. The software was supposed to pull fathers' names from state records, but wound up pulling information from other areas of the birth records so the fathers' names were incorrectly printed on the birth certificates.
Some of about 500 erroneous certificates affected fathers in Allegheny, Beaver, Indiana, Washington and Westmoreland counties, Senior said. She declined to identify the parents because the information is confidential.
“It affected a group of records processed in late December, after a new software update from the vendor,” she said. “Those birth certificates were mailed in early January.”
Senior said about 35 of recipients of the false birth certificates contacted the department to correct the mistake.
The state's permanent, computerized birth records are correct, however. Those incorrect birth certificates have received a letter explaining the mix-up and instructions on how to get a corrected copy, Senior said.
Staff writer Bill Zlatos contributed to this report.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Security policies limit ‘insider threat’ at airports, TSA says
- Pittsburgh police chief finds use-of-force policies ‘quite satisfactory’
- Pet chiropractic more popular in Western Pa., but doubts linger
- SWAT incident in Ross ends peacefully
- Attorney wants evidence from South Allegheny teacher’s cellphone thrown out
- Suspect in Glassport man’s shooting death put on house arrest
- Police find marijuana grow rooms in Castle Shannon
- Buffalo man killed by truck in the West End Circle wanted ‘a fresh start’
- Newsmaker: John Carson
- Pittsburgh on cusp of leaving fiscal oversight
- In letter, Plum school superintendent reassures parents on safety