Hampton school district, teachers reach deal
The Hampton Township School District and its teachers have reached a contract agreement after 18 months of negotiations.
The four-year deal, retroactive to June, freezes teachers' salaries in 2013-14. Afterward, salaries on average are projected to increase about 3 percent. Teachers with less senority will receive larger pay raises, and those at the top of the salary scale will receive average annual increases of less than 1 percent.
Teachers will contribute more to their health care coverage, according to the district and the Hampton Township Education Association, which did not provide details.
The contract contains a one-time early retirement incentive that would pay those who take it $10,000 a year for up to four years.
The district's 210 teachers and the school board reached a tentative agreement last month. Teachers approved it last week, and the school board approved it on Monday.
“The entire process was handled in a very professional manner,” said David Gurwin, Hampton school board president. “We knew that we had a partner on the other side of the table in people who truly care about the education of our students.”
Chuck Ceccarelli, president of the teachers union and a high school chemistry teacher, said negotiations lasted longer than anyone expected.
“We were hoping to have it done earlier. It's always a difficult process. The extreme cuts that came from the governor's budget have put pressure on school districts,” Ceccarelli said.
Rick Wills is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7944 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.