TribLIVE

| News

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Judge rules against Supreme Court Justice Melvin accuser's hidden identity in federal lawsuit

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Saturday, Jan. 26, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
 

Embarrassment is no longer a reason to shield the identity of someone involved in a federal lawsuit, a federal judge ruled on Friday in a case involving a key witness in the state's prosecution of Supreme Court Justice Joan Orie Melvin.

U.S. District Judge Gary Lancaster in 2010 allowed Jamie Pavlot to use the pseudonym “Jane Doe” while suing her former boyfriend on a claim that he infected her with herpes. Pavlot filed her lawsuit in federal court because her former boyfriend lived in Connecticut at the time.

In a motion to federal court, Melvin sought to unseal Pavlot's identity. She said the details of Pavlot's lawsuit contradicted her testimony during Melvin's preliminary hearing about Pavlot's medical condition and what caused her stress in November 2009, a time period that figures in Melvin's case.

Lancaster said the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals since has limited pseudonyms to cases in which the person has reasonable fear of being severely harmed if he or she is identified.

Stephen Stallings, Pavlot's attorney, could not be reached for comment.

Pavlot, in responding to Melvin's motion, said the justice selectively quoted the hearing transcript to make it appear there were contradictions in Pavlot's testimony. She also claimed Melvin wanted to embarrass her.

Charles Kelly, one of Melvin's attorneys, declined to comment other than to say Lancaster's decision will ensure Melvin receives a fair trial.

“One of her primary accusers is going to have both her competence and credibility thoroughly tested,” Kelly said.

State prosecutors have charged Melvin and her sister Janine Orie with using the justice's court staff and equipment in her 2003 and 2009 political campaigns for state Supreme Court.

Pavlot, the former chief of staff for another sister, former state Sen. Jane Orie, has testified that all three sisters ordered her to do political work while she was on the state payroll.

Brian Bowling is a staff writer forTrib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-325-4301 or bbowling@tribweb.com.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Allegheny

  1. Rising East Liberty out of reach for Pittsburgh’s poor
  2. Bill seeks to give Pittsburgh police license plate info
  3. Tablets for Allegheny County Jail inmates deemed a success
  4. Beating victim from McKees Rocks recalled as skilled family man
  5. Child falls through window in Marshall-Shadeland, taken to Children’s
  6. Newsmaker: Kathryn Jolley
  7. Filing in Scaife case challenges subpoena request by his children
  8. Western Pa.’s ties to 2016 White House race extend beyond Santorum
  9. Water line bursts at Allegheny General Hospital
  10. $1B rapid bridge replacement across Pa. aims for savings, safety
  11. Water pipes break in succession in Carnegie, Heidelberg, Rosslyn Farms